2 comments on “KCG response to University banner planning application”
I entirely agree with those opposing the University’s Banner Proposals and am shocked that anyone in charge of the Universities affairs, would think it a good idea. Not only as it has been already suggested add unnecesary clutter, of which there is already too much in Bristol .Surely University students can find their way about without such pointers? There are already elegant sign posts., maps and for the gadget obsessed Satnav. I would prefer enhancement of the invironment not downgrading. Elizabeth A Watts Miller
I am in complete agreement with the Kingsdown Conservation Group’s reply to the university’s banner proposals. The University lies within an inhabited city. The proposed signs appear to back up the idea that the street is part of a campus when it is no such thing. They will make the street look messy and cluttered and there is no need for them anyway. In fact current planning regulations already rule them out – why are the University authorities ignorant of these rules, or so they imagine they do not apply to a university?
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
2 comments on “KCG response to University banner planning application”
I entirely agree with those opposing the University’s Banner Proposals and am shocked that anyone in charge of the Universities affairs, would think it a good idea. Not only as it has been already suggested add unnecesary clutter, of which there is already too much in Bristol .Surely University students can find their way about without such pointers? There are already elegant sign posts., maps and for the gadget obsessed Satnav. I would prefer enhancement of the invironment not downgrading. Elizabeth A Watts Miller
I am in complete agreement with the Kingsdown Conservation Group’s reply to the university’s banner proposals. The University lies within an inhabited city. The proposed signs appear to back up the idea that the street is part of a campus when it is no such thing. They will make the street look messy and cluttered and there is no need for them anyway. In fact current planning regulations already rule them out – why are the University authorities ignorant of these rules, or so they imagine they do not apply to a university?